Here's an example: if I want to see which fraction is bigger, 13/24 or 7/12, I can use the butterfly method (also known as cross multiplication) to multiply 13 by 12 and 24 by 7 and compare the results. But if I do this, I am not really engaged with the fractions at all. I haven't learned anything new about either fraction, and my answer wouldn't help me put either on a number line. If I at least rewrite the second fraction and realize that 7/12 = 14/24, I have a natural way to determine which fraction is bigger that uses the fractions themselves and not somewhat unconnected whole numbers. Here, the butterfly method is a procedure that may obscure the conceptual understanding that comes from using equivalent fractions.
Well, once I started thinking like this, I started seeing procedures trumping conceptual understanding a lot more. For example, there's a great paper in the NCTM journal Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School called Saving Money Using Proportional Reasoning. It's by Jessica de la Cruz and Sandra Garney and outlines tasks that would make a great project after discussing rates and proportions. Instead of emphasizing cross multiplication, the authors emphasize unit rates and equivalent fractions (which are both hugely important in 6th grade Common Core). Here's a great picture from their article about why cross multiplication can give confusing answers:
What exactly is a dollar-pound? |
How often do you hear "Because ____ said so"? |
No comments:
Post a Comment